EVR - Street Fighter or Street Dog?
- Bharathi Kanda Pudhumai Pen
- Oct 8, 2025
- 4 min read
As I research about him a lot both within the cult and from the "sane-mind" perspective. I see one of the prominent writer who mentions EVR as "Street Fighter". Woah There! Slow down mister!
He goes on and on about EVR was uneducated and how he connected with the masses because of his nature. He was too relatable and a "Street fighter". And he often praised that EVR was way to ahead of his time and his ideologies were did just not go through people's primitive minds. He was a universalist and Blah! Blah!
Ewwwwwww! That's just Gross!
He often made comparison to other educated leaders and how EVR differed from them, because he was "uneducated". In an interview he explicitly mentioned how EVR differs from Ambedkar is that, Ambedkar was a well educated Law student who fought systemic issues in his own way. And EVR was an uneducated person who fought the evil by hand in streets. (What he meant was Ambedkar was book smart and EVR was street smart)
Yeah! No Shit, Sherlock!
Society is evolved to a point all the issues are not visible to human eyes. It's more of mental issues at this point. You are actually not in a physical threat or in a war scenario where your opponent is waiting with a gun pointing at you.
To fight that, is book smart the solution or street smart?
You cannot combat racism, casteism, women's rights on streets. These involve educated nuanced approaches. For that you need education and tackle them in a way educated people does. Leave the systemic issues to the educated ones!
You fight gun with gun and words with words.
For so long we have been brain-washed with EVR's words and now its time to think about this rich asshole, who's too deep into mass population's ideologies.
As an Anti-EVR, I dont see him as the street fighter that the writer says that he is.
I see him as the rabid street dog barking at Brahmins saying that they are the problem for all societal issues.
You can take any issue publication written by him. In no way shape or form, he hasn't brought Brahmin community within the issue and tarnished them to the ground. He wanted to see them go extinct in his lifetime.
Alas! The poor soul did not witness to see the community genocided.

So where do we take accountability for the shit that Brahmins didn't do? For instance, Brahmins don't believe in killing people. But, violent honor caste-based murders are happening till date in Tamil Nadu.
Should that particular community be held responsible? Or the particular individual be held responsible?
Or a whole unrelated community be held responsible for the crime that occured?
Answer: Individual should be held responsible!
Ding! Ding! Ding! Yes the community that he belonged should also not be held responsible.
"You can argue with me that they set this system up so that these kind of crimes occur."
ROFL that story is not going to fly anymore!
Nobody imposed this system onto anyone to follow. You are free not to follow this made-up hierarchy. Nobody's keeping you hostage till you act on it.
Where do we draw the line?
Because the line that is drawn by EVR, seems to be a circle drawn around particular community making them the target for all the societal crimes.
That's not how a fair system works in a democracy.
Ok just for an assumption, let's envision this. Let me just give you what would've happened if we tried to remove the illusionary root cause of all evil that is "Brahminism"?
Say for example we have removed the existence of evil beings that is "Brahmins" from the society. Maybe the EVR's long wet dream of genocide did happen. And we nuked the Brahmin community to oblivion.
Will the societal issues get magically fixed by a simple hand wave?
Do women get liberated? No! Because patrairchy still exists.
Will caste system get abolished? No! because there's still someone at the top.
Someone will take the place by power, money, fame or by brute force.
Heirearchy is never gone. It just evolved. Now some other asshole has control. So to fight "hierachy" what do you think the solution is?
You can prove yourself of your worth irrespective what the society says and get yourself educated on the history of you and your community and go to a place of power, money or fame with the education that you've acquired and then try to reform the system from that place.
Trying to change the system if you are a nobody will not work and never work and that too in these trying times.
You should be somebody to get your voice heard and you need to get your issues and your communities' issues to be addressed. That's how society is rigged.
The same rule applies for me too. Being a women, I can't just be a stereotype. I fight patriarchy in my own terms, not by barking at men. (And sometimes I do feel like giving up. But I'll never stop. I do envision a better future for Women)
It's easier for me to blame all the women issues are caused by Men and just sit around doing nothing. That's not the solution.
Will you accept what I said? Even if it's true? No!
If I do that, I'm going to create a polarised community with people who "Support me" and people who "Demonize me".
It's not going to bring a "Solution".
I will be seen as a hater through and throughout my life. I will not be seen as the solutionist or a revolutionist. Just a man-hating feminist who barked at men. That's how I see EVR who barks at brahmins for no f*cking reason.
I need to put in my hard work and take some accountability for the things that happen in my life. The things that I can control, or better yet how I can react to certain situations.
Again you are free to think for yourself. Or follow the blind path to nowhere and blame an entire community for all shortcomings of society. Just try not to believe everything that the cult members' say.
It's upto you.


Comments